Skip to content
Client Area
Start the protocol

Capability | Sales and Commerce

A channel without governance is a margin conflict waiting to happen.

We design channel architecture with coverage criteria, engagement rules and conflict traceability so that each channel operates within its perimeter with institutional visibility.

Channel governance by the numbers

43.4%

of price dispersion for identical products in the same distribution network

Chiu et al. / SAGE Open 2022 ↗
83%

of B2B industrial companies without value-based pricing; the indirect channel operates with no policy

Hinterhuber / IMM 2004 ↗
70%

of CRM failures come from data quality, not from technology choice

Alshawi et al. / IMM 2011 ↗
60% conflicts

of channel partners report rising conflict; 36% say conflict significantly eroded performance: a collective loss of margin, not a zero-sum game

Eshghi & Ray / JAMS 2021 ↗

The risk nobody maps

60% of channel partners report rising conflict. Does your operation know where the overlap starts, and what it costs?

When channels operate without a coverage map, without engagement rules and without conflict traceability, every route to market invents its own policy. The result is territorial overlap, price war between channels and margin that evaporates: quarter after quarter.

The real scenario

Four structural failures that erode channel governance every day

Each failure runs in silence. Together, they decide whether channels complement each other or compete.

01

Overlapping territories with no mapping

Direct and indirect channels chase the same customer with different terms. With no coverage map, each team sets its own route, and conflict becomes an invisible cost that only shows up once margin has already deteriorated.

02

Informal engagement rules

Who serves which segment? Who has priority on overlapping accounts? With no documented policy, each channel invents its own rule, and the operation loses predictability every cycle.

03

Conflict with no structured escalation

Disputes between channels get settled case by case, with no criteria and no record. Each conflict eats executive time, wears down the relationship with partners and exposes the operation to inconsistent decisions.

04

Margin eroded by unmonitored routes

43.4% price dispersion for identical products in the same network. With no traceability by channel, accumulated discounting transfers value to the intermediary, and the effect only shows up in the quarterly consolidation.

Chiu et al. / SAGE Open 2022 ↗

Gov­erned Channel Archi­tecture

Bunker

We have seen this scenario before. And we know where channel complexity hides.

Multichannel operations do not fail from having too many partners. They fail because coverage, engagement, escalation and traceability run as disconnected dimensions. The Bunker Protocol connects those layers into a single architecture: with governance, criteria and institutional visibility.

We do not eliminate channels. We design the operation that keeps each channel inside its perimeter.

  • 40+ B2B operations with channel governance installed
  • 300+ CRM projects with multichannel architecture
  • 8 countries with active commercial governance
  • Documented reduction of channel conflict in 60%+ of cases

The Bunker Protocol applied to Channels

Four phases. One channel architecture. Auditable governance.

Phase 01

Coverage Diagnosis

We map the channel structure end to end: territories, overlaps, informal rules and conflict points. We identify where the channel competes with itself, where coverage never arrives and where margin is lost for lack of governance. The diagnosis reveals the real cost of multichannel informality.

Outcomes
  • Overlap map between direct and indirect channels
  • Real cost of each territorial conflict point
  • Prioritization of fronts by impact on margin and coverage
Phase 02

Territory Architecture

Building on the diagnosis, we design the coverage architecture: territories with criteria, segments with priority, channels with a defined role. Each route to market gets a clear operating perimeter: with priority rules and resolution criteria.

Outcomes
  • Territories defined with coverage and priority criteria
  • Channels with formalized roles, segments and routes
  • Resolution criteria for unavoidable overlaps
Phase 03

Engagement Rules

We formalize multichannel engagement policy in the real routine of the operation. Conflict escalation with criteria, dispute logging with traceability, resolution under a defined SLA. From there the channel resolves each conflict by protocol.

Outcomes
  • Multichannel engagement policy documented and active
  • Escalation flow with SLAs and a decision trail
  • Conflict log with traceable resolution
Phase 04

Governance and Hand-off

We install a traceability dashboard with visibility of performance by channel, rule adherence and residual overlap. The operation evolves in waves, with progressive autonomy. The goal is for your team to manage channels without depending on us.

Outcomes
  • Governance dashboard with performance by channel and segment
  • Adherence and conflict indicators on a defined cadence
  • Operational autonomy transferred to the internal team

Transformation

From channels in conflict to a governed coverage architecture

Without Bunker

Channels competing with each other

  • Overlapping territories with no coverage map
  • Engagement rules set case by case
  • Conflicts settled by personal relationship, not by criteria
  • Price dispersion for identical products across channels
  • Margin eroded by unmonitored routes

With Bunker

Channels with governance and a perimeter

  • Territories mapped with coverage and priority criteria
  • Engagement policy documented and active in the operation
  • Conflicts escalated with protocol, SLA and tracking
  • Performance by channel visible and auditable
  • Margin protected by route and segment governance

Every month of ungoverned channels is conflict piling up and margin that never comes back.

The first step is a coverage diagnosis. No commitment, no generic slide deck. Assess whether your channel scenario justifies a different architecture.

Talk to a specialist Request a comparable case

This service is part of the capability Sales and Commerce.

See also: Structured Commercial Policy | Commercial and Approval Flows | Commercial Intelligence Platform