Data with critical errors
47% of records contain critical errors and only 3% meet minimum quality standards. Commercial decisions based on inaccurate data erode margin with each cycle.
Nagle, Redman & Sammon / HBR 2017Chemicals and Specialties
The application engineer solves problems in the field. Margin is lost between qualification and contract.
Chemical specialty companies that integrate specification, TCO, and cost-to-serve capture 250–400 bps more in EBITDA. Most still operate SDS, pipeline, and technical support in silos. Bunker connects this chain with Bunker Protocol, Salesforce, and AI.
Chemicals by the numbers
47%
of records contain critical errors; only 3% meet minimum standards
Nagle, Redman & Sammon / HBR 2017€9.5B
in real REACH compliance costs; 4× the European Commission's initial estimate
Rovida & Hartung / Johns Hopkins-ALTEX 2009The silent risk in chemicals
A 5% improvement in average price can raise EBIT by 22%. Does your commercial operation have the governance to capture that margin?
When commercial, technical, and supply operate in separate systems, every negotiation happens without full context. The result is margin that quietly escapes - by application, by account, and by formulation.
The real scenario
Four fractures that erode margin per formulation and per account
The application engineer specifies, the commercial team negotiates, the technical team follows up - and none of the three can see what the others did. Every context-free handoff is wallet share lost per application.
Compliance without traceability
Real regulatory compliance costs can be four times higher than initial estimates. Without document traceability, every audit becomes an operational crisis.
Rovida & Hartung / Johns Hopkins-ALTEX 2009Context-free handoffs
Between commercial, laboratory, production, and supply, every handoff happens without history. The customer repeats information, the proposal is delayed, and the technical rep has no pipeline visibility.
Revenue lost to bad data
15% to 25% of revenue is compromised by poor-quality data. In chemicals, where margin varies by formulation and application, the impact is even more severe.
Redman / MIT Sloan 2017Chemical Integrated Architecture
Bunker
We know the difference between selling a commodity and selling a specialty - and how margin is lost between specification and order.
The sales cycle is technical and long. Trials take months. Qualification stalls on the customer side. And cost-to-serve per application is a black box. The Bunker Protocol connects commercial, application engineering, and supply in a single architecture: with traceability by formulation, TCO view per account, and pricing governance that distinguishes commodity from specialty.
We don't sell CRM. We design the operation that transforms technical specification into traceable pipeline.
- +300 CRM projects: including chemical operations with technical sales and qualification
- +120K users impacted, from application engineer to supply chain
- Commercial governance deployed in 8 countries with regulatory compliance
- Direct experience in specialty chemicals, agrochemicals, and polymers
Bunker Protocol applied to Chemicals
Four phases. One architecture. Auditable results.
Evidence
Auditable results in chemicals and specialties
+2–5 p.p.
in Return on Sales with dynamic pricing by product-formulation-customer-transaction combination
McKinsey Chemicals Practice 2024250–400 bps
in EBITDA margin expansion in 12–24 months with end-to-end commercial rewiring via analytics and GenAI
McKinsey: "Rewiring for growth in chemicals" 2026–15–50%
in cost-to-serve for chemical specialties via commercial channel digitalization and quote automation
McKinsey: "Demystifying digital in chemicals" 2018Fragmented pipeline, disconnected technical support, and decisions without traceability in a multisite operation.
Bunker designed the complete CRM architecture on Salesforce, integrated processes between commercial, laboratory, and supply, and installed pipeline governance with auditable predictability.
Request access to additional information about this and other cases compatible with your context.
Request a compatible case studyTransformation
From isolated specification to integrated technical-commercial chain
Without Bunker
Every handoff without history
- Commercial and technical teams with separate data and conflicting account versions
- Technical support with no link to commercial history and pipeline
- Pricing defined by salesperson without governance per application
- Pipeline invisible to the operation's executive management
- Document compliance spread across multiple systems without traceability
With Bunker
Traceability from specification to order
- Unified view of account, formulation, and margin across commercial, technical, and supply
- Technical support connected to CRM with prioritization by value and risk
- Pricing governance with traceability by application and segment
- Auditable pipeline with real-time executive predictability
- AI applied to the daily routine with alerts, summaries, and action recommendations
Every specification that advances without traceability is margin lost between the lab and the order.
The first step is a technical-commercial diagnostic. No generalism, no talk of "customer journey" as if it were retail. We map where your operation loses margin between formulation, application, and cost-to-serve.
Frequently asked questions
Answers for Chemicals and Specialties
01 How does the protocol address the long qualification and technical sales cycle? Expand
The diagnostic maps the real cycle - from formulation request to customer approval - and identifies where each bottleneck consumes margin and time. The architecture is designed to accelerate handoffs between laboratory, application engineer, and commercial, not to simplify what is complex by nature.
02 Do you understand regulatory compliance (REACH, GHS, ANVISA)? Expand
We are not a regulatory consultancy. But we design the operation so that compliance is native: expiry alerts, batch traceability, and interaction audits are embedded in the flow - not in parallel spreadsheets.
03 Does the solution work when each customer has a specific formulation? Expand
It works especially well in that scenario. The platform organizes formulation history by account, connects application engineer and commercial with technical context, and prioritizes the portfolio by contribution margin - not by volume.